Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: RFC on Net::Ping

by Falkkin (Chaplain)
on Mar 20, 2001 at 05:07 UTC ( #65601=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: RFC on Net::Ping
in thread RFC on Net::Ping

This is a good point.

On the other hand, the current default, UDP, typically returns false even when pinging the local host (127.0.0.1). This, by itself, has caused so much confusion that there are posts all over the 'net asking, basically, "Why doesn't Net::Ping work?" My general idea for fixing this problem is to always use the most accurate ping available on a given system. If people can't be bothered to read the POD, I guess I consider that their own problem. On the other hand, I think the major problem here is that the current POD gives no explanation of why some types of ping are incredibly inaccurate.

I suppose we could default to ICMP, which would actually make most (non-root) people read through the POD before playing with the module.


Comment on Re: Re: RFC on Net::Ping

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://65601]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-29 05:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (260 votes), past polls