Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Quantified named captures in 5.10

by halley (Prior)
on Dec 21, 2007 at 13:56 UTC ( #658449=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Quantified named captures in 5.10

I guess I wouldn't expect the addition of named captures to change how captures work in regexes. Just because the capture variable has a name does not mean that the () or a+ semantics have changed.

The pre-5.10 version looks like this (I've added a term to show the singularness of captures.

my $str = 'Digits: 123689 abc'; if ($str =~ m{Digits: \s* (\d)+ \s+ (\w+) }x) { print 'Digits: ', $1, ' ', $2, $/; } __OUTPUT__ Digits: 9 abc
With the numeric "names" for captures, it seems natural that there's only one slot. Adding a + to the capture does not add more capturing group instances to the system. There's one actual set of parentheses, so there's one actual capture.

[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://658449]
[Discipulus]: ProvoLanX? grin..
[holli]: wow. the google translation to german is really good
LanX has to go go/
[holli]: baba

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-11-20 19:59 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    In order to be able to say "I know Perl", you must have:

    Results (292 votes). Check out past polls.