Re^2: 5:10: Why is this slower than 5.8.8?


Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer
	PerlMonks

Re^2: 5:10: Why is this slower than 5.8.8?

by jk2addict (Chaplain)

on Dec 23, 2007 at 17:06 UTC ( #658784=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: 5:10: Why is this slower than 5.8.8?
in thread 5:10: Why is this slower than 5.8.8?

Thanks for that thought. I'll give that a try for sure. If using FreeBSD malloc solves the problem, I'd vote that it should be the default in Configure given the nature of the 50% performance difference for a common idiom.

Comment on Re^2: 5:10: Why is this slower than 5.8.8?
Re^3: 5:10: Why is this slower than 5.8.8? by eserte (Deacon) on Dec 23, 2007 at 17:19 UTC
I proposed this some four years ago (see this message at perl5-porters), but Jarkko was against it that time.	[reply]
Re^3: 5:10: Why is this slower than 5.8.8? by eserte (Deacon) on Dec 23, 2007 at 17:20 UTC
s/solves/causes/ Perl's malloc is fine.	[reply]
Re^4: 5:10: Why is this slower than 5.8.8? by Anonymous Monk on Dec 23, 2007 at 17:43 UTC
Try to compile 2 versions of perl5.8 on FreeBSD - one with mymalloc, other - without. And then compare their perfomances. You will be very dissapointed. The one which uses FREEBSD's malloc will be 20-30% faster in almost any operations.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://658784]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others perusing the Monastery: (9)

As of 2013-05-22 03:37 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

The best material for plates (tableware) is:

Results (453 votes), past polls