Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Should Programmers Unionize?

by DrHyde (Prior)
on Jan 17, 2008 at 11:57 UTC ( #662853=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Should Programmers Unionize?
in thread Should Programmers Unionize?

DrHyde's commentary is a good example of why union power can be a bad thing. He considers his personal powerlessness to be sufficient reason to disrupt a smoothly functioning system
Did you lie deliberately there, or are you just stupid and incapable of reading?
He reminds me of the nasties from Earth First or the Weathermen, who believed it is perfectly legitimate to murder to make a point.
Ah, there's the answer to my question. You're a moron. Thanks for letting us know.


Comment on Re^2: Should Programmers Unionize?
Re^3: Should Programmers Unionize?
by samizdat (Vicar) on Jan 21, 2008 at 12:54 UTC
    Whew! You are correect (the first assumption, anyway). I remembered your nasty, vitriolic tone and read more into it than what you actually said. It was actually apl who discussed disrupting the means of production.

    As to the second point (?), I occasionally do make errors of fact and I usually apologize for them. Whether that makes me a "moron" is up to the perceiver and his system of semantic distinctions. In my perception of reality, somebody who drips verbal poison to the extent that you do isn't likely to live long enough to leave a positive legacy or very intelligent children, so in the bigger picture, I don't think I score so badly.

    Don Wilde
    "There's more than one level to any answer."

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://662853]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-07-30 12:40 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (231 votes), past polls