Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re: !@#$ $#_

by Dominus (Parson)
on Mar 25, 2001 at 20:05 UTC ( #67032=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: !@#$ $#_
in thread !@#$ $#_

Says MeowChow:
It looks as if any complex sub-expressions /subroutine calls are evaluated in order, and variables/references are evaluated last.
That's very astute of you. It's not exactly what's going on, but it's very close. For simple variables, Perl pushes what is effectively a reference onto the stack. But for complex ecpressions, Perl must construct the new value and push a reference to that instead. So if $i = 2, then $i in the list pushes a reference to $i itself, but $i + 0 copies $i and pushes a reference to the copy of the 2. If you later change $i, the first 2 changes but the second one doesn't.

Your original example works the same way.

This could be considered a bug. It has come up on p5p before, but I don't remember what the outcome of the discussion was.

Contrary to what chromatic said, it is not a precedence issue. Precedence only affects parsing, not execution.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://67032]
help
Chatterbox?
[robby_dobby]: ambrus: Yes
[hippo]: erix++: "the browser ate my code"
[robby_dobby]: Eily: Now, people are trying to be inventive with crowdsourcing their work, eh? Sure, call on the admins to k-line these sockpuppet accounts!
[robby_dobby]: hippo: I like how you equated your browser to a dog....
[Eily]: well, Anonymonk is everyone's sockpuppet :D

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (9)
As of 2017-04-25 13:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I'm a fool:











    Results (454 votes). Check out past polls.