in reply to Re^3: newbies, <code> tags and recognizing perl
in thread newbies, <code> tags and recognizing perl
hmmm...i used <pre> tags to preserve the <code> in what appears to be in <code>...i had presumed that the caveat against this was in place because download is a product of <code> and not <pre>; but if you say my last post looked screwed up to you then either:
you are borderline illiterate
our browsers (me=linux/mozilla) are producing different output and i should never have used <pre>
As for my post being a re-iteration of BrowserUK's post, i agree -- vote for BrowserUk!
Regarding the preview button: I use it to death, but w/r/t a newbie poster i think the "in textarea" statement would be even more "intuitive" (if we can attribute intuition to newbies and knowlege to the practiced)
As for my post being a re-iteration of BrowserUK's post, i agree -- vote for BrowserUk!
Regarding the preview button: I use it to death, but w/r/t a newbie poster i think the "in textarea" statement would be even more "intuitive" (if we can attribute intuition to newbies and knowlege to the practiced)
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^5: newbies, <code> tags and recognizing perl (adjunct)
by ww (Archbishop) on Mar 21, 2008 at 15:31 UTC |
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion