Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: let's discuss your abuse of inappropriate powers

by goibhniu (Hermit)
on Mar 21, 2008 at 20:29 UTC ( #675519=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to let's discuss your abuse of inappropriate powers

A distinction that works against your point is that we don't vote on monks, we vote on nodes. Monks don't have reputation, nodes do.

I understand that the reputation of my nodes is tied to my xp, but when I vote, I'm voting on the node, not the monk. There are poorly thought out replies in PMD just as there are technically inadequate answers in SoPW and I would still want to have the option of downvoting them. Also, upvoting or downvoting nodes by Anonymous Monk are still useful, as the good nodes get highlighted to the community and the bad nodes pointed out as well; this despite the fact that it has no impact on anyone's xp.

I certainly take your point that nodes should not be downvoted simply because of opposition to the opinion expressed. In my utopia this is accomplished by a culture of kindheartedness and lots of documentation rather than taking away the mechanism altogether or starting a flame war.


#my sig used to say 'I humbly seek wisdom. '. Now it says:
use strict;
use warnings;
I humbly seek wisdom.


Comment on Re: let's discuss your abuse of inappropriate powers

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://675519]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-07-28 04:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (185 votes), past polls