in reply to Re^2: Perl 6 shocking revelations #1
in thread Perl 6 shocking revelations #1
I would move the list of new and unapproved features from the bottom to the top.
I also suggest this pattern for the first sections. That is, move the conclusion to the top of the section, and explain what you are getting at. This drops the 'shocking revelation' motif, but would be an easier read. The text and examples are interesting enough. It doesn't need additional drama, in my opinion.
I think it would be interesting to continue demonstrating inheritance with the Complex and Quaternion examples that you hint at. You could show how they do or do not give correct answers when inheritance is used. What makes this interesting is that one would probably work, and the other probably wouldn't, which I think would make your point well.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^4: Perl 6 shocking revelations #1
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Apr 30, 2008 at 18:25 UTC | |
by toma (Vicar) on May 05, 2008 at 21:57 UTC |