Re: My preferred version control system is...

[syphilis]

in reply to My preferred version control system is...

How could an ageing anarchist possibly vote for anything other than "subversion" !!!

Cheers,
Rob

[amarquis]

I thought git was the new hotness all the cool kids used these days? (I know nothing about git except from a few comments here at Perlmonks)

[merlyn]

See my google tech talk on git and my FLOSS Weekly interview with Git's chief maintainer.

[monarch]

How could any serious developer consider subversion? It isn't even close to mature and has some serious administrative flaws.

At least CVS has been around for a while and the underlying structure is well understood. And graphing applications for the history of a file in subversion are not easy to come by.

What is worst about subversion is the inability to make a catastrophic check-in disappear. Anyone who argues that giving the administrator god-like powers is a bad thing (as the restrictive subversion treats the admin like a lowly untrustworthy grasshopper) clearly hasn't used Perl much where the philosophy is giving enough rope to hang oneself.

I've yet to have a convincing argument that subversion is worth looking at for a serious source code repository system yet (at least while CVS is so superior).

[kyle]

How could any serious leader consider democracy? It isn't even close to mature and has some serious administrative flaws.

At least monarchy has been around for a while and the underlying structure is well understood.

What is worst about democracy is the inability to make a catastrophic decision disappear. Anyone who argues that giving the government god-like powers is a bad thing (as the restrictive democracy treats the admin like a lowly untrustworthy grasshopper) clearly hasn't worn a crown much where the philosophy is giving enough rope to hang one's enemies.

I've yet to have a convincing argument that democracy is worth looking at for a serious governmental system yet (at least while monarchy is so superior).

(Yes, I know this is somewhat unfair. Nevertheless, it practically wrote itself.)

[swampyankee]

There is, of course,

use strict;
use warnings;
use Perlmonks qw/poll/;
open(my $from, "<", previous_node('latest poll')) or die "Couldn't fin
+d previous_node\n;
local $/;
my $prev = <$from>;
close($from)
s/monarchy/Fortran/gi;
s/democracy/Perl/gi;
print $prev;

[ysth]

Everyone is looking for a different subset of all possible features. I would find CVS unlivable after using subversion, because subversion fixes things that really bothered me in CVS. Obviously you don't feel the same, so I can't really argue the (by design) "serious administrative flaws".

But did you have something specific in mind with the "isn't even close to mature"?