in reply to Re: My preferred version control system is...
in thread My preferred version control system is...
At least CVS has been around for a while and the underlying structure is well understood. And graphing applications for the history of a file in subversion are not easy to come by.
What is worst about subversion is the inability to make a catastrophic check-in disappear. Anyone who argues that giving the administrator god-like powers is a bad thing (as the restrictive subversion treats the admin like a lowly untrustworthy grasshopper) clearly hasn't used Perl much where the philosophy is giving enough rope to hang oneself.
I've yet to have a convincing argument that subversion is worth looking at for a serious source code repository system yet (at least while CVS is so superior).
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: My preferred version control system is...
by kyle (Abbot) on May 20, 2008 at 16:54 UTC | |
by swampyankee (Parson) on May 26, 2008 at 15:29 UTC | |
Re^3: My preferred version control system is...
by ysth (Canon) on May 25, 2008 at 21:53 UTC |