http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=689575


in reply to Re^4: One for the weekend: challenge
in thread One for the weekend: challenge

Well, you've rewritten the requirement to avoid the problematic "can", but that you did so, rather than argue that "can" is not ambiguous, just shows that "can" is unambiguously ambiguous :)

Would the sample provided in the spec have any additional solutions? If not, this falls into the category of ambiguities remaining after "all ambiguities" are resolved by the sample.