Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like?

by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor)
on Jul 15, 2008 at 06:21 UTC ( #697646=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like?
in thread What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like?

Don't you need to use the multi keyword on those subs?


Comment on Re^4: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like?
Download Code
Re^5: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like?
by moritz (Cardinal) on Jul 15, 2008 at 07:53 UTC
    It's better style, but if the prelude defines a proto infix:<+> (and I'm quite sure it does) it's redundant. Good catch anyway.
      Ah yes, I remember that now. One motivation behind proto was that, so existing code included after it would not cause conflicts but become multis (and the proto standardizes the argument matching).

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://697646]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (18)
As of 2014-07-31 18:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (250 votes), past polls