Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like?

by moritz (Cardinal)
on Jul 15, 2008 at 07:53 UTC ( #697660=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like?
in thread What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like?

It's better style, but if the prelude defines a proto infix:<+> (and I'm quite sure it does) it's redundant. Good catch anyway.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like?
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Jul 15, 2008 at 22:26 UTC
    Ah yes, I remember that now. One motivation behind proto was that, so existing code included after it would not cause conflicts but become multis (and the proto standardizes the argument matching).

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://697660]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (11)
As of 2016-12-05 16:57 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:













    Results (89 votes). Check out past polls.