Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)

by BerntB (Deacon)
on Jul 27, 2008 at 17:04 UTC ( #700390=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)

Cons (DBIx::Class)
...
# No built-in support for MANY-TO-MANY relations. (Is this true?)

Multiple comments and no one commenting. Hmm.. am I misunderstanding? I thought this solved that?

  • Comment on Re: Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)
by aulusoy (Scribe) on Jul 30, 2008 at 21:06 UTC

    Thank you for your comment. I have updated the post accordingly.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://700390]
help
Chatterbox?
[huck]: "and all is quiet..." "Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery" ... something seems not quite right ...
[huck]: just the first time i noticed the "uproarious" message ... i must be bored

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2017-02-24 03:07 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Before electricity was invented, what was the Electric Eel called?






    Results (351 votes). Check out past polls.