Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re^4: Good Forums?

by herveus (Parson)
on Aug 21, 2008 at 12:07 UTC ( #705769=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: Good Forums?
in thread Good Forums?


Having been a long time user of mutt, I find that gmail's "threading" is seriously lacking. Unless I've missed something (and I may have), it simply groups messages based on the subject line. Change the subject and gmail thinks that it's a different "conversation". Further, gmail obscures the tree structure in the thread. You can't readily tell which message was replied to, making it hard to keep track of a heavily branched thread.

On the other hand, I agree with the remainder of the positives. The lack of true threading is a sore subject with me.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://705769]
[LanX]: yep
[erix]: or Ctrl-U to view current html :P
[LanX]: name not id
[LanX]: id isn't approved AFAIK
[LanX]: name works
erix feels silly for having actually tested that contiguous values make no difference in CLUSTERing a table (At least, in postges)
[LanX]: Perl Monks Approved HTML tags
[LanX]: erix and his postguess ...
[erix]: (Grrres...)
[dabella12]: I have a problem install tK on CeontOs using perl 5.24

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (11)
As of 2017-06-24 13:30 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?

    Results (557 votes). Check out past polls.