in reply to Re: Object Persistence, Moose and playing nicely with ActiveRecord in thread Object Persistence, Moose and playing nicely with ActiveRecord
Waiting for moosification of DBIx::Class - I did find something demonstrating Moose and DBIx::Class playing together, but the repeated declarations gave me the shudders. It seems as if it shouldn't be hard to extend Moose's declaration syntax to implement something like MooseX::DBI, but it's one of those Simple Matter Of Programming things isn't it? Easy in principle, but tedious in practice.
Re^3: Object Persistence, Moose and playing nicely with ActiveRecord
by stvn (Monsignor) on Sep 09, 2008 at 03:01 UTC
|
I did find something demonstrating Moose and DBIx::Class playing together, but the repeated declarations gave me the shudders.
You can take a look at the as-yet-unreleased MooseX::DBIC here which provides a Moose-ish layer over the top of DBIx::Class and (IMO at least) nicely merges the strengths of DBIx::Class with the meta-goodness of Moose. It is not 100% feature complete, there are still some bridging between more obscure DBIC features to be done. But fwiw, this is currently used in a production application and so far so good.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
|
I realise that this probably isn't the forum for it, but can I just say publicly that stvn rocks!
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
|
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
|