Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things

Re (tilly) 1: I refuse to explain this

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Apr 10, 2001 at 01:42 UTC ( #71177=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to I refuse to explain this

FWIW I ran this with 5.6 on Linux and it is a standard JAPH. (Ran a little slowly, but oh well.)

I just thought a success report would make sense when everyone else is reporting failure.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: I refuse to explain this
by Dominus (Parson) on Apr 10, 2001 at 07:17 UTC
    Says tilly:
    Ran a little slowly...
    It is doing a lot of computation. I did put in an optimization that makes it somewhat smaller and faster; perhaps you ran the original version.

    Actually by observing which parts are printed quickly and which are printed slowly get can get a better notion of what the program is going.

Re: Re (tilly) 1: I refuse to explain this
by MeowChow (Vicar) on Apr 10, 2001 at 03:18 UTC
    Hmm... it worked for me yesterday, but Dominus changed the formatting today, and I'm now getting the same results as MrNobo1024.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://71177]
[choroba]: The order of package - (strict+warnings | warnings+strict) - modules makes sense, POD and strict-warnings order are not so important

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (9)
As of 2018-01-23 17:07 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?

    Results (250 votes). Check out past polls.