Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
Re: I refuse to explain thisby Dominus (Parson) |
on Apr 13, 2001 at 02:57 UTC ( [id://72228]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Says petral:
looks kinda like unlambdaWow, great catch! I had forgetten all about unlambda, and I owe you big thanks for reminding me. You are absolutely correct. You can think of this program as an interpreter for a language very similar to unlambda. In particular, the I, `, S, and K have exactly the same meaning as in unlambda. Now I don't have to refuse to explain the program; I can just point to the unlambda web pages. There are a bunch of variations here, but if you understand unlambda, it should be easy to understand this program. (That is something of a poisoned apple, because hardly anyone does understand unlambda.) Everyone should give petral a big ++ on this for being so clever.
In Section
Obfuscated Code
|
|