Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: A question of test complexity

by dragonchild (Archbishop)
on Nov 19, 2008 at 14:31 UTC ( #724601=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to A question of test complexity

First off, why support Test::MockDBI when DBD::Mock exists? The maintainer of that module would love some help, as he's told me more than once.

That method of generating tests is completely outdated and should be rewritten completely. It's unnecessarily complex and doesn't play well with Test::Harness. Put everything into .t files and get rid of the multiple invocations. For one thing, being able to say "prove t/foo.t" is nice.


My criteria for good software:
  1. Does it work?
  2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?


Comment on Re: A question of test complexity
Re^2: A question of test complexity
by andreas1234567 (Vicar) on Dec 05, 2008 at 08:39 UTC
    That method of generating tests is completely outdated and should be rewritten completely.
    The test suite of Test::MockDBI has been completely rewritten as of version 0.62. See Changes.
    --
    No matter how great and destructive your problems may seem now, remember, you've probably only seen the tip of them. [1]

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://724601]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-09-02 03:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite cookbook is:










    Results (18 votes), past polls