Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: HTML::Template vs. Template::Toolkit vs. ??

by monarch (Priest)
on Jan 07, 2009 at 00:04 UTC ( #734520=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to HTML::Template vs. Template::Toolkit vs. ??

Mason and Template Toolkit basically generate Perl code. HTML::Template, on the other hand, is a pure separation of template from code.

Should you be concerned if the module hasn't been updated in some time? Only if you find yourself worrying when the IPv4 protocol is still in use without any significant changes for some time. Only if you find the cron daemon a bit outdated for your liking.. My point is that if something works and does what it says on the box then stability is generally a good thing.

Updated: grammatical corrections.


Comment on Re: HTML::Template vs. Template::Toolkit vs. ??
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(re:purity) HTML::Seamstress > Petal > HTML::Template
by metaperl (Curate) on Jan 08, 2009 at 14:31 UTC
    HTML::Template, on the other hand, is a pure separation of template from code.
    It is rather pure (moreso than tt/mason), but Petal is purer and HTML::Seamstress is even more pure.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://734520]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (9)
As of 2015-07-07 23:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (93 votes), past polls