Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re^4: (Mis)Understanding grep...eq $_ (versus ex-bang-bang)

by parv (Priest)
on Feb 24, 2009 at 08:08 UTC ( #745927=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

Comment on Re^4: (Mis)Understanding grep...eq $_ (versus ex-bang-bang)
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: (Mis)Understanding grep...eq $_ (versus ex-bang-bang)
by grinder (Bishop) on Feb 24, 2009 at 23:39 UTC


    I dare say the ex-bang-bang approach is faster, but then I would be rightly accused of premature optimisation. The grep approach, while slower (but at a cost approaching zero) is more easily figured out from first principles.

    The effect of x!! is not easily discerned; one has to write a harness to explore its behaviour. Either because one has encountered a similar idiom in a different language and wants to see if Perl matches expectations based on prior experience, or else they have not the faintest idea of what it does (and once one sees what it does, can they determine why?)

    So in summary, there is a difference. One is tricksy, the other is merely degenerate.

    • another intruder with the mooring in the heart of the Perl

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://745927]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2015-10-07 03:22 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    Does Humor Belong in Programming?

    Results (170 votes), past polls