Re^2: Process for Site Improvement

in reply to Re: Process for Site Improvement
in thread Process for Site Improvement

If someone really felt motivated, they could go through all the old PMD threads looking for likely suggestions.

Sounds more like something a robot should do. One that is good with manipulating text and has plenty of already written code that can assist with traversing websites and such. :P

I'm not sure if that joke is overused here…

And you didn't even know bears could type.

Comment on Re^2: Process for Site Improvement
Re^3: Process for Site Improvement by jdporter (Canon) on Mar 12, 2009 at 22:32 UTC
If we had a working tag system, we could tag various PMDs as `feature_request`, `bug_report`, `general_rant`, and so on.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Process for Site Improvement by Lawliet (Curate) on Mar 12, 2009 at 22:58 UTC
Do we have one that does not work? Is it that little thing that says what type of node the currently viewed node is?. `Node Type: note` And you didn't even know bears could type.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Process for Site Improvement by jdporter (Canon) on Mar 13, 2009 at 02:12 UTC
We have one, but it's not fully enabled for ordinary users. (You can view and set keywords on nodes (via the Keyword Nodelet), but there's no easy way to utilize the keywords.) tye and I talk about it in this relatively recent sub-thread. tye also said these important things about it. Is it that little thing that says what type of node the currently viewed node is? No, that's something else: node type. Each node can have only one, and it is determined by the system, and is immutable. (Well, janitors can change a node's type, in some cases, but it's a radical change, analogous to re-blessing, vs. merely changing the value of a data member.) Between the mind which plans and the hands which build, there must be a mediator... and this mediator must be the heart.	[reply]


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks

Re^2: Process for Site Improvement

How many continents have you visited?