Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical

Re^3: Inline::C's AoA is much bigger than Perl's

by almut (Canon)
on Mar 17, 2009 at 02:31 UTC ( #751089=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Inline::C's AoA is much bigger than Perl's
in thread Inline::C's AoA is much bigger than Perl's

The remaining difference in speed is most likely due to strlen of "foo" being recomputed every time in the inner loop (i.e. the zero in newSVpv(foo, 0) ).

Precomputing it once (as Perl can do too, because the "foo" in "foo" x $n_cols is by definition fix) — i.e.

SV *make_aoa_c( int n_rows, int n_cols ) { int i, j; char *foo = "foo"; AV *table = newAV(); AV *row; int len = strlen(foo); av_extend(table, n_rows-1); for ( i = 0; i < n_rows; ++i ) { row = newAV(); av_extend(row, n_cols-1); for ( j = 0; j < n_cols; ++j ) { av_push( row, newSVpv( foo, len ) ); // or newSVpvn(...) } av_push( table, newRV_noinc( row ) ); } return newRV_noinc( table ); }

makes any XS vs. Perl speed difference go away (or at least statistically insignificant).

(Without this optimisation I did observe a small, but consistent difference — approx. 5% on average.)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://751089]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (6)
As of 2017-10-19 00:18 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My fridge is mostly full of:

    Results (251 votes). Check out past polls.