Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is there a better way to learn Tk?

by renodino (Curate)
on May 08, 2009 at 17:39 UTC ( #762890=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is there a better way to learn Tk?

As others have mentioned, Perl/Tk may not be your best solution. Have you considered Tkx ? IIRC, our friends at ActiveState are pretty actively maintaining/using it.

As for books, "Mastering" is the best bet; I once saw "Learning" described as "quite possibly the nadir of O'Reilly books"...and I concur.


Perl Contrarian & SQL fanboy


Comment on Re: Is there a better way to learn Tk?
Re^2: Is there a better way to learn Tk?
by pobocks (Chaplain) on May 09, 2009 at 05:52 UTC

    Do you know what the performance/requirements difference between the two packages is, by any chance? What I can find seems to indicate that Perl/Tk directly wraps the C code for Tk, whereas Tkx wraps Tcl calls Tk. I can't imagine that not causing some performance difference.

    for(split(" ","tsuJ rehtonA lreP rekcaH")){print reverse . " "}print "\b.\n";
      perl/Tk is probably faster, but Tkx is more up to date in terms of features/widgets and will run on perl 5.6.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://762890]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-12-25 15:01 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (160 votes), past polls