Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Regex bug in 5.10 (was: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind)

by jds17 (Pilgrim)
on May 08, 2009 at 19:47 UTC ( #762920=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Regex bug in 5.10 (was: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind)
in thread Using Look-ahead and Look-behind

You are right, my change did not affect greediness. The bad thing is: now I don't understand why my proposed solution worked at all. Maybe someone can explain? I don't think the question is too important, but I like to use regular expressions and it bugs me a little if I cannot understand one (especially such a tiny one).

I have read the documentation you have cited and it helped, so I played around some more and tried out the following, which only exchanges "+" for "*" in your original expression, really works as one would think and therefore would be my preferred solution, at least for Perl 5.10:

$_ = "Hello"; print "$1\n" while /(?=(.+))/g;
Output:
Hello ello llo lo o


Comment on Re: Regex bug in 5.10 (was: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind)
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://762920]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-07-01 23:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (24 votes), past polls