Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Preferred RPC method?

by ruoso (Curate)
on Jul 01, 2009 at 13:38 UTC ( #776428=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Preferred RPC method?

It's funny that you mention SOAP as the "main" option. Because SOAP was a PITA untill very recently, mostly because SOAP::Lite is really a mess. But today you have very interesting solutions to SOAP in Perl that are much more mature, much less messy and much more standards-compliant.

On the other hand, SOAP is a protocol that expects a very strong and strict typing, that means you need to spec your data accordingly, which might be possible and even desired in a lot of cases, but on the other hand, writing a WSDL might be overkill for a lot of scenarios.

That being said, if you choose SOAP, I'd first recommend you writing a XML Schema describing the data that you want to transfer, then writing a WSDL describing how you're going to transfer it, then you can use the following modules to implement it:

  • XML::Compile::SOAP
  • Catalyst::Controller::SOAP and Catalyst::Model::SOAP if you like frameworks

But, as I said, that might be overkill for a lot of applications. SOAP is only worth the trouble when there's a need of data validation and consistency that can be documented as a XML Schema. Otherwise JSON is a great choice.

daniel


Comment on Re: Preferred RPC method?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://776428]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-08-01 02:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (285 votes), past polls