in reply to Re: Perl is not Dynamically Parseable
in thread Perl is not Dynamically Parseable
I'm not sure what you mean here by "two instances of the Perl parser". I'm pretty sure I know what you're getting at, but I wouldn't call it two instances of the parser. It is more like two possible syntactic interpretations/parses of the same piece of code, depending on the prototype of a previously defined sub.
Saying "two instances of the parser" produce different things (on the same given code, presumably) makes it sound simply like the parser is non-deterministic or randomized.
blokhead
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: Perl is not Dynamically Parseable
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 13, 2009 at 00:54 UTC | |
by blokhead (Monsignor) on Oct 13, 2009 at 18:15 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 13, 2009 at 23:19 UTC | |
by blokhead (Monsignor) on Oct 14, 2009 at 02:57 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 13, 2009 at 19:43 UTC | |
by blokhead (Monsignor) on Oct 13, 2009 at 22:36 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 13, 2009 at 23:27 UTC |
In Section
Meditations