Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re: Including code without packaging?

by mikfire (Deacon)
on May 16, 2001 at 00:54 UTC ( #80718=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Including code without packaging?

I could be slightly annoying and point out Config::IniFiles already exists. Then again, "rolling your own" can frequently be fun.

As to your exact question, I would make a package anyway. It only adds a few lines to the file and I can almost promise you this code will grow. More functions will be added, maybe some different variables to control how errors are handled, etc. If you start with a package now, it will save you some hassle later.

Of course, ymmv

Comment on Re: Including code without packaging?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Including code without packaging?
by traveler (Parson) on May 16, 2001 at 01:12 UTC
    When I check cpan for this I can only access the README, the module gives a "Not Found". Is this a CPAN problem or has the module been removed?
      Go here and click on the Latest Release link. That worked for me
Re: Re: Including code without packaging?
by Madams (Monk) on May 18, 2001 at 07:04 UTC
    I agree with your viewpoint..I personally have a module named MyUtilities where i just stuff algos i use over and over. One day a REAL module may just spontaneously jump out of it. Meanwhile i use it just like a junk drawer for code... :)
    (__) (\/) /-------\/ / | 666 || * ||----||

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://80718]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-12-01 06:39 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (795 votes), past polls