Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^6: Turing completeness and regular expressions

by JadeNB (Chaplain)
on Nov 28, 2009 at 18:34 UTC ( #809929=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^5: Turing completeness and regular expressions
in thread Turing completeness and regular expressions

Thanks for clarifying—I think that I do take your meaning correctly now.

My issue comes with one subtle point, which is that, as you mention, we have a choice between incorporating a look-up table into our string, or using multiple substitutions; and the most naïve way of making use of the look-up table, as I did, turns the substitutions from s/fixed/fixed/ to something involving capturing parentheses. My question was thus: Can we get the best (or “apparently least computationally powerful”) of both worlds, by having just one substitution, but not using anything but the ordinary (theoretical-CS, not Perl-enhanced) regular-expression constructs—in particular, no back-references—in it?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://809929]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: since 2002 I just usewd www.perlmonks.org and good morning
Discipulus .oO(maybe a PM discussion?)
[Corion]: Discipulus: Yeah, I left a note to the replies mentioning pairsite.com ;)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (9)
As of 2017-09-26 07:55 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    During the recent solar eclipse, I:









    Results (293 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?