Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Russ
The stupid question is the question not asked

Re^7: better (faster) way of writing regexp

by ikegami (Pope)
on Dec 03, 2009 at 22:38 UTC ( #810970=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^6: better (faster) way of writing regexp
in thread better (faster) way of writing regexp

I "win"! :) My machine, not the one I ran the benchmark on:

Number of cores 1 (max 1) Number of threads 1 (max 1) Name Intel Pentium 4 Codename Northwood Specification Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz Package (platform ID) Socket 478 mPGA (0x2) CPUID F.2.7 Extended CPUID F.2 Brand ID 9 Core Stepping C1 Technology 0.13 um Core Speed 2004.5 MHz Multiplier x FSB 20.0 x 100.2 MHz Rated Bus speed 400.9 MHz Stock frequency 2666 MHz Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 Data cache 8 KBytes, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line +size Trace cache 12 Kuops, 8-way set associative L2 cache 512 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte lin +e size FID/VID Control no

From that machine:

This is Perl 5.010001 Rate range repeat isook unpack substr range 117311/s -- -6% -7% -24% -81% repeat 124414/s 6% -- -2% -20% -80% isook 126456/s 8% 2% -- -18% -79% unpack 155069/s 32% 25% 23% -- -74% substr 607361/s 418% 388% 380% 292% --

I'm scared of looking at the stats of my tv computer (aka Frankenputer). It's some kind of P3, for starters.

Comment on Re^7: better (faster) way of writing regexp
Select or Download Code

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://810970]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-04-18 00:30 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:

    Results (460 votes), past polls