Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings?

by Ovid (Cardinal)
on Feb 05, 2010 at 12:45 UTC ( #821550=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings?
in thread Should Test::Most import strict and warnings?

Test::Most, not Test::More. That's a very important difference here.

  • Comment on Re^2: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings?
by JavaFan (Canon) on Feb 05, 2010 at 14:34 UTC
    Test::Most, not Test::More. That's a very important difference here.
    Sorry, I'm just used to typing Test::More.

    But that doesn't change my arguments. I wouldn't want any module to turn on a pragma in the calling scope - unless that is its specific purpose. turn::on::all::pragmata should turn it on. But not something from the Test::* namespace.

      I'd say that reducing boilerplate code is one of the main advantages of Test::Most, so I think it will be logically if it will enable strict and warnings. The people who don't love surprises and magic can always replace it with:

      use strict; use warnings; use Test::More; use Test::Exception; use Test::Differences; use Test::Deep; use Test::Warn;
        It's not that I think the person typing in use Test::Most will be surprised.

        It's the person inheriting the code.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://821550]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2016-06-25 09:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My preferred method of making French fries (chips) is in a ...











    Results (323 votes). Check out past polls.