Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re^3: cross scope gotos?

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Apr 06, 2010 at 16:04 UTC ( #833062=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: cross scope gotos?
in thread cross scope gotos?

You can't jump to a label out of the current or previous frames!

I think that's (currently) an over statement:

perl -le"goto loop; $x=0; if( $x ){ while(1){ loop: print 'hi' } }"

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: cross scope gotos?
by LanX (Chancellor) on Apr 06, 2010 at 16:09 UTC
    > I think that's (currently) an over statement:

    nope, while has a proper block but not a proper "frame" like foreach or subs.

    (I read somewhere that foreach has internally a frame, but no time to search now...)

    But the confusion is understandable, that's why I started the thread.

    Cheers Rolf


      perl -le"goto loop; $x=0; if( $x ){ for(;;){ loop: print 'hi' } }"

      Update: Ah, you did say foreach

      >perl -le"goto loop; $x=0; if( $x ){ for(1){ loop: print 'hi' } }" Can't "goto" into the middle of a foreach loop at -e line 1.

      Mind you, it's not really related to stack frames. Any required frame is created by goto. Since it's an explicit check for OP_ENTERITER, it appears more of a question of there not being any sensible way of initialising the iterator of the iterated loop into which you are jumping.

      /* push wanted frames */ if (*enterops && enterops[1]) { OP * const oldop = PL_op; ix = enterops[1]->op_type == OP_ENTER && in_block ? 2 : 1; for (; enterops[ix]; ix++) { PL_op = enterops[ix]; /* Eventually we may want to stack the needed arguments * for each op. For now, we punt on the hard ones. */ if (PL_op->op_type == OP_ENTERITER) DIE(aTHX_ "Can't \"goto\" into the middle of a foreach loo +p"); CALL_FPTR(PL_op->op_ppaddr)(aTHX); } PL_op = oldop; }

      Update: Improved phrasing of last paragraph and added supporting code.

        Well I don't know anymore where I read the word "frame" in connection with foreach-loops.

        The glossary of the docs is often far too fuzzy to justify a long discussion...

        Anyway grepping through the docs produced

        perldiag.pod: (P) The foreach iterator got called in a non-loop context frame.

        (I didn't say "call frame")

        But the C code is quite hard for me too understand without more conceptual basics... which are fuzzy ...

        Cheers Rolf

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://833062]
[thezip]: Howdy y'all. Is it safe to just delete StrawberryPerl-> cpan->build directories?
[1nickt]: karlgoethebier Thank you!! How could I not have ever heard of this musician?
[choroba]: thezip should be ok.
[thezip]: It seemed so, choroba, but I don't want to confuse anyone (especially myself!)
[choroba]: thezip unless something like this happens to you.
[thezip]: I don't intend on doing any offline development in the Czech Republic soon, so i think I'm safe!

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-03-23 21:00 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

    Results (294 votes). Check out past polls.