Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Awk and Perl unique features

by eyepopslikeamosquito (Chancellor)
on Apr 16, 2010 at 09:02 UTC ( #835047=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Awk and Perl unique features

From perlvar:

Remember: the value of $/ is a string, not a regex. awk has to be better for something. :-)
I suspect this not allowing a regex in Perl's record separtor $/ variable was the source of the famous Larry Wall quote:
Hey, I had to let awk be better at *something*... :-)

Seriously, I've used both awk and Perl extensively over the years, and I'd say Perl wins easily for just about everything. Perhaps most tellingly, Perl scales better as programs tend to naturally grow larger over the years (as I similarly argued against Unix shell in Unix shell versus Perl). By all means compare Perl with Ruby and Python, but not awk: it's no contest.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Awk and Perl unique features
by rubasov (Friar) on Apr 16, 2010 at 12:22 UTC
    Larry Wall let awk to be better at *something* in the past, but tsee was not so kind-hearted to awk (fortunately), so he has written File::Stream. :-)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://835047]
help
Chatterbox?
[shmem]: otoh, hindering me from spending the money before due time is worth some fee, isn't it?
[jedikaiti]: Pretty!

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (9)
As of 2017-09-19 15:44 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    During the recent solar eclipse, I:









    Results (222 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?