Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^7: The current state of Perl 6

by moritz (Cardinal)
on Apr 20, 2010 at 08:03 UTC ( #835703=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^6: The current state of Perl 6
in thread The current state of Perl6

Maybe it has. But you can't know from just looking at the time frame. TimToady usually says he'd rather like Perl 6 to take longer than finishing on time, and being crap. I agree.

Still we are well aware that some things are very hard to achieve, which is why occasionallly features are removed from the spec. See S01 for more thoughts.

Perl 6 - links to (nearly) everything that is Perl 6.


Comment on Re^7: The current state of Perl 6
Re^8: The current state of Perl 6
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 20, 2010 at 08:09 UTC
    Every body agrees with that!! The question is how much longer????
      As long as it takes.
        So there you go again, we are back to square one. Really it looks like you guys are out to invent some new software development methodology which no one has heard, seen or used before. The only thing is if your experiment fails it may mark the death of Perl.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://835703]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-07-11 23:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








    Results (236 votes), past polls