http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=835778


in reply to Re^2: How to Implement Perl 6 in Ten Years
in thread The current state of Perl6

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
  • Comment on Re^3: How to Implement Perl 6 in Ten Years

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: How to Implement Perl 6 in Ten Years
by IBlowGoatsSucker (Beadle) on Apr 21, 2010 at 09:50 UTC
    Who is stalking who here? And I do not believe you about the COBOL. You say you will go back to COBOL, but in a private message to me you say

    hi, you seem to have a lot of free time on your hands, instead of trolling perlmonks I suggest we write some Perl code together, what do you think ? :)

    So you are a liar as well as a dickhead (in your own words and currently the highest ranking dickhead in PERL according to Google) and you will sadly not give up on Perl. I also decline because I am here for the trolltrolling, not the perlwriting.
Re^4: How to Implement Perl 6 in Ten Years
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 21, 2010 at 14:07 UTC
    Come on, let's go to COBOL together - I haven't liked the direction Perl has taken for a long time, and most of the perl 6 developers, especially Chromatic, who is some sort of Perl diva -- one word name? Who are you, Cher? Anyway, you are not alone - there's a lot of people who don't like the direction perl has taken since ~2000.
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.