good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
Re^3: A wholly inadequate reply to an Anonymous Monk (Perl++)by LanX (Canon)
|on Apr 23, 2010 at 09:42 UTC||Need Help??|
Thank you this was the best anonymous post in a while expressing much of my thoughts much better than I could.
I wholeheartedly support the "Rakudo/Parrot/Pugs/Ponie/whatever..." team but IMHO most of the problems and tensions are the result of a communication tragedy.
Honestly, Perl6 should be renamed into something like Perl++.
It's much more than the next evolutionary step of Perl5, it's incorporating revolutionary concepts which can't be achieved in normal release steps..
But at the same time we are living in a marketing world, where the crowd measures the quality of a product at the release numbers.
Releasing a Perl5 compatible successor, maybe just bundling Moose for OOP and Coro for multithreading and maybe some syntax cosmetics and restriction│ to contradict the "write only language" complaint would easily cannibalize the Ruby spectra like they are actually cannibalizing the Python spectra.╣
But sadly such a successor can't be named Perl6, because this name slot is already taken.
And at the same time the "Perl++ team" has to cope with the burden and pressure of the whole community impatiently waiting for a answer to the contemporary needs.
They are constantly forced to justify why they are making gold, where the market just needs iron to be turned into steel. ▓
Thats a marketing desaster!
Actually it took thousands of years to replace them ...
UPDATE: added links and to title and improved language
╣) It's so paradox to see how a beautified syntax on Perl semantics plus Smalltalk object model named Ruby easily takes steadily growing market shares ....
▓) and let me be clear Perl++ IS gold, but meanwhile our customers live in the stone age and are going to other jewelers to buy gems made of iron...
│) perl critic but anal!