Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: A logo for Perl

by sri (Vicar)
on Jun 23, 2010 at 15:42 UTC ( #846103=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: A logo for Perl
in thread A logo for Perl

These are just first drafts, i was expecting to refine (or even redraw) them based on feedback from the Perl 6 decision makers.
Everything would have been possible, sadly there is no interest and i'm giving up now, the logos will not get finished.


Comment on Re^2: A logo for Perl
Re^3: A logo for Perl
by audreyt (Hermit) on Jun 26, 2010 at 16:07 UTC
Re^3: A logo for Perl
by thunders (Priest) on Jul 16, 2010 at 15:38 UTC

    sadly there is no interest and i'm giving up now, the logos will not get finished.

    I'm sorry to hear that, I think your design showed a lot of promise. Is this a case of nobody in a position of influence wanting to hurt Larry's feelings? Because the current logo is just awful. Unprofessional, ugly, it reinforces many of the unfortunate negative stereotypes about perl that I hear from other programmers. And I really think the official logo for Perl 6 should really be something that's open to debate

      Is this a case of nobody in a position of influence wanting to hurt Larry's feelings?

      No; plenty of people have expressed opinions of Camelia both pro and con. (I like Camelia, and not only because it annoys people to the point of threatening never to use Perl 6.)

      I really think the official logo for Perl 6 should really be something that's open to debate.

      Go ahead and debate it with Larry then. Good luck.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://846103]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-10-25 13:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (143 votes), past polls