Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re: For loop problem

by bikeNomad (Priest)
on Jun 03, 2001 at 22:44 UTC ( #85351=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to For loop problem

You're looking at execution order for the '..' operator:
++$. .. $.++ . $.
There's no guarantee as to which operand of the operator gets evaluated first. In this case, it appears to be the RHS ($.++ . $.). So you get '12', but you leave $. at 2. Then the loop happens.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: For loop problem
by srawls (Friar) on Jun 03, 2001 at 22:56 UTC
    Ok, thanks bikeNomad, that does make sense. What I'm still confused at, though, is how the interperter decides the order it evaluates in. Here are a few test cases:
    When I use this is evaluates the left side first, and cycles through 1 to 11.
    But as soon as I add that second ++, it evaluates the right side first, and cyles through 2 to 12.
    And this is perhaps the strangest of them all. It evaluates the right side of the ...(flip flop) operator first, and also evaluates the right side of the . (concatanation) operator first. It cycles through 2 to 22.

    The 15 year old, freshman programmer,
    Stephen Rawls
      The problem is that the list ($a .. ++$a) is not evaluating a list like you think it is. It is not doing:
      $start = $a; $end = ++$a; for ($_ = $start; $_ <= $end; $_++) { ... }
      But rather, it is evaluating its endpoints, and then constructing the list from that. That is the cause of your problem:
      for (++$x .. $x++ . $x) { ... } # starting at ++$x # ending at $x++ . $x # THE END HAS MODIFIED THE START
      You can witness a similar result from:
      print ++$x, ++$x, ++$x; # 333
      You see, the arguments to a function aren't copies of the variables, but rather aliases -- by modifying ONE of the $x's, you've modified the others as well.

      Knowing this, the output of this program makes sense to me:

      $x = 3; print ++$x/$x--; # 3/4 => 0.75
      Why is that? Well, the numerator is ++$x, and the denominator is $x--; but in subtracting 1 from $x in the denominator, we have now altered the numerator back to its original state!

      I've worked out a solution to your 1 .. 12 loop, then.

      for (++$x .. $x++ . $x--) { ... } # or for (++$....$.++.$.--) { ... }
      See if you can work out why the starting point is 1.

      japhy -- Perl and Regex Hacker
        print ++$x, ++$x, ++$x; #333 print ++$x, $x++, ++$x; #313

        Given a left to right evaluation, to me this should produce 123 and 113 respectively.

        "You see, the arguments to a function aren't copies of the variables, but rather aliases -- by modifying ONE of the $x's, you've modified the others as well"

        I can accept that but what about this:
        my $x=3; print $x, $x=5, ++$x, $x--, $x, $x++, $x=0; #0006050 print $x++, $x=5, ++$x, $x--, $x, $x++, $x=0; #3006050

        Again, 3566550 seems the reasonable output (to me) for both accounts. Instead the post-(in|de)crement operators seem to be squireling away their value of $x when it came by them in a left to right evaluation of the terms.

        I can see the pattern and work with it, my question is why is it that way? What are the advantages to this type of evaluation? I don't know enough Perl to extrapolate the reasoning behind them.

        As one final example consider:
        $x = 3; print ++$x/$x--;

        Coming into the function x is 3, it gets pre-incremented (now 4), it's divided by x (still 4), x is post-decremented (to 3). Print outputs 1 (4/4) and x leaving the function is 3. This is how it _should_ happen to my mind, instead it's 3/4 as stated earlier.

        Maybe it's just my logic that's skewed or I'm showing a glaring flaw in my understanding of how operations need to work internally, but it seems rather convoluted for no good reason.

        -- I seek enlightenment

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://85351]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-05-27 08:23 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?