Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: A more elegant solution?

by Cirollo (Friar)
on Jun 05, 2001 at 02:07 UTC ( #85630=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: A more elegant solution?
in thread A more elegant solution?

D'oh. *slaps forehead*

Another classic case of focusing on one solution, so the other one that is staring you in the face gets ignored.

But, these hashes will not have a fixed number of elements; do I need to put a string of ?, ?, ... , ? in my statement and then just pass a list through execute? Or is there some placeholder that says "put a list here"?


Comment on Re: Re: A more elegant solution?
Download Code
Re: Re: Re: A more elegant solution?
by runrig (Abbot) on Aug 20, 2001 at 02:17 UTC
    But, these hashes will not have a fixed number of elements; do I need to put a string of ?, ?, ... , ? in my statement and then just pass a list through execute? Or is there some placeholder that says "put a list here"?

    Well, if there is not an unholy number of combinations of columns, then this is not a bad solution. If there is going to be a large number of 'different' statements prepared, then this is still ok, but I would just use prepare() instead of prepare_cached.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://85630]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-07-22 09:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (109 votes), past polls