Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re: Packaging Perl Programs (is) Painful

by talexb (Canon)
on Sep 04, 2010 at 17:57 UTC ( #858885=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Packaging Perl Programs (is) Painful

Consider this another vote for the 'make it client/server' argument.

Every workstation, no matter what OS, has a browser, and a browser's really just a general purpose GUI application. Get a server capable of running Apache (or any other web server), build a web application, and use that instead of trying to fight with packaging something to be installed on Windows.

Alex / talexb / Toronto

"Groklaw is the open-source mentality applied to legal research" ~ Linus Torvalds

Comment on Re: Packaging Perl Programs (is) Painful
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Packaging Perl Programs (is) Painful
by BrowserUk (Pope) on Sep 04, 2010 at 18:09 UTC

    And what if the application requires access to the local file system? Or large volumes of data? Or large amounts of cpu? Or all three?

    Why advise a course of action that requires a complete re-write of an already working, existing application, just in order to avoid packaging that application? Especially when there is no need to package it in the first place.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://858885]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2016-04-29 07:26 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW

    Results (438 votes). Check out past polls.