Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Does anybody know what's happened to GD?

by SilasTheMonk (Chaplain)
on Oct 06, 2010 at 11:58 UTC ( #863765=perlquestion: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??
SilasTheMonk has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

The last time the question of GD VS ImageMagick Again... was asked back in 2007,GD seemed like a clear winner a least for basic web resizing of images. Since then the underlying GD library seems to have died. http://libgd.org/Main_Page seems to stop at that point. The library is in the 'oldlibs' section on Debian. I cannot really believe the that the library reached it's final form whilst having 94 bugs. Assuming that the project has died and no one takes over, how do monks feel about this?

Comment on Does anybody know what's happened to GD?
Re: Does anybody know what's happened to GD?
by Corion (Pope) on Oct 06, 2010 at 12:02 UTC

    I use Imager and Image::Thumbnail for basic resizing and most image handling. I guess that GD fell by the wayside as it never supported JPG.

      Since when did it never support JPEG?

        Weird - it seems that it "always" supported JPEG. I was always under the impression that GD only supported GIF, GIF+PNG, PNG and then GIF+PNG again, when the GIF patent expired (disregarding fringe formats such as XBM). From browsing through the versions of Makefile.PL, it seems that JPEG support came (unnoticed) in 1.26 , which is the first to check for -ljpeg.

        So I must have formed my image of GD in 2000, which is about when I started with Perl, and never updated my assumptions...

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: perlquestion [id://863765]
Approved by Corion
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-07-22 09:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (109 votes), past polls