in reply to Re^21: eval to replace die?
in thread eval to replace die?
You cannot correct bad process by over-engineering.You are right, i cannot. I can merely lessen the chance of others actions based on bad process being a danger and i will gladly do so.
There was no reason to parse the error message. You never did anything with the results of the parsing.There was a reason, since i did something with the result, which i stated in the second paragraph. The value of the change (positive/negative) determined the direction of the change and based on that a css style which is used to colour the message. This not contrived, but slightly anonymized code i've encountered, written by others.
You think? Read again.I would like to ask you to look at the original starting post of this node tree and ponder the intent of the message the user is asking the perlmonks about. I am of the opinion that it correlates very closely with what i said.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^23: eval to replace die?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 09, 2010 at 23:04 UTC | |
by mithaldu (Monk) on Oct 09, 2010 at 23:54 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 10, 2010 at 09:01 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom