Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked

Re^3: What is "aggressive" argument?

by MishaMoose (Scribe)
on Oct 30, 2010 at 18:56 UTC ( #868496=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: What is "aggressive" argument?
in thread What is "aggressive" argument?

I think you have made a valid point. One thing I have noticed about programmers over the years is that there is rarely a lack of passion in their opinions and very few I have known are exactly timid or lack self confidence. Sometimes this gets expressed rather more energetically in the course of a discussion than we mean or realize.

Speaking solely from my own experience there are 2 things i really have to remind myself about when I get passionate

1. All parties of the discussion are not aware of all of the assumptions, viewpoints, knowledge or history of the others, so it can be easy to make assumptions

2) correction It takes 2 people to there to be an offense. The quote from Rufo in Robert Heinlein's Glory road comes to mind ďAn insult is like a drink; it affects one only if accepted. ... for clarification we always have the choice to refuse to be offended ...

And yes I am too often prone to accept the drink ... even when it wasn't meant to be offered.

I like to try to take the tack that if I do not understand what some one says (or think I do and find it somehow unacceptable) to say 'I do not understand. can you explain?' rather 'You are wrong!' However this is still very much a work in progress in my case.

only my 2 kopeks and as always YMMV

Misha/Michael - Russian student, grognard, bemused observer of humanity and self professed programmer with delusions of relevance

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: What is "aggressive" argument?
by mr_mischief (Monsignor) on Nov 01, 2010 at 02:51 UTC
    In programming, as in certain other fields, it sometimes pays to be rash and opinionated even though those are often known as negative traits. Indeed, when faced with myriad options to implement pretty much any given application one should probably pick just one or two with which they are familiar and weigh just those options. To weight all options equally before acting is not to act. The fault is not in having biases. It is in being inflexible in reassigning those biases as evidence stacks against them.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://868496]
[Tux]: [ttps://metacpan. org/source/ MLEHMANN/Canary- Stability-2012/| this is the main reason] never ever to use anything he wrote ever again
[Tux]: [htps://metacpan. org/source/ MLEHMANN/Canary- Stability-2012/| this is the main reason] never ever to use anything he wrote ever again
[Discipulus]: you are almoste there..retry ;=)
[Tux]: Hmm, that must be something in pm_cb_g
[Tux]: in the dialog area it shows correct, but the url is broken in the CB
[Discipulus]: you still need to put href:// , no?
[Tux]: [htps://metacpan. org/source/ MLEHMANN/Canary- Stability-2012/| this] is the same link posted on the PM side inside the CB
[Discipulus]: and you wrote ttps and then htps
[Tux]: new try

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2017-09-20 07:24 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    During the recent solar eclipse, I:

    Results (234 votes). Check out past polls.