Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Re: Moose and AUTOLOAD

by stvn (Monsignor)
on Nov 03, 2010 at 15:41 UTC ( #869263=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Moose and AUTOLOAD

"handles" would not work too, because I know the eventual method names only at runtime and they may change.

Moose doesn't have anything to help you out with this, and honestly, changing method list at runtime is a serious design smell. You don't want the method list of RecordSet to be continually changing every time you make a new instance of a different table.

Also, why aren't you using one of the perfectly good ORMs out there? DBIx::Class? Fey::ORM? Rose::DB::Object?


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Moose and AUTOLOAD
by rootcho (Pilgrim) on Nov 04, 2010 at 15:05 UTC
    I like ORM, but they are not well suited for every task. I rather steal some of the ideas and make my own. ;)

    Which is lighter and more pure-SQL-query centric, with all the benefits and drawbacks of having more control.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://869263]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (6)
As of 2018-01-16 12:35 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?

    Results (178 votes). Check out past polls.