in reply to
Re^40: What is "aggressive" argument?
in thread What is "aggressive" argument?
Again you repeat. I will start my demonstration, to make you able to tango better.
I choose Re^3: Algorithm Showdown: Fuzzy Matching, which is a good trolling you did. You troll the monk demerphq. He is a fine target, because he is a valuable contributor to the perlmonk community, and he has added lots of code to perl itself. To be a good troll you should continue attacking people like him!
In your trollpost you write
There are lies, damned lies, and demerphq's statistics!
This is excellent trolling! I will use it myself some day (it is good to plagiurize other trolls, it adds to the community). You insult him indirectly and he will feel the pain through your superior rhetoric.
messy, overcomplicated, ill-structured code
Superb! Attack the code, not the man, it shows your technical superiority, and you hide the slurs. Do not say anything useful, or you would contribute. He feels the pain, I tell you.
I have also noticed that you set up your troll in Re: Algorithm Showdown: Fuzzy Matching. There you ask 7 numbered questions. It looks as if you want a technical discussion and he is suckered in. Then, wham you troll him. Well done!
See, Troll, you can do it. Try doing better in your next reply. I will give you some time for this homework.
TrollEducator Imperator Rex