|laziness, impatience, and hubris|
Re^30: What is "aggressive" argument?by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Nov 15, 2010 at 22:14 UTC||Need Help??|
You do realize that if you refute my right to express my free
Strawman. I never said you couldn't hold an opinion. Only that you had no right to try and enforce it upon me. I emphatically told you my position about 15 levels back--and that was a repeat of an earlier post--but you've continued to repeatedly badger me to accept your position. Which of us is the troll?
Anyway, so you basically just said you could care less about any credible evidence. Of course, based on past posts, it's a safe bet that you *would* use evidence that supported your position. And unfortunately, that leads me to conclude you have been trolling since your OP. The only thing I cannot figure out is if you are even aware of that. You would probably claim you do not care. But ironically you do care that in your mind you are being unjustly singled out. It's too bad you cannot connect the dots. Paraphrasing what I said earlier, I hope you enjoy your one man crusade against the world.
Isn't that entire paragraph a personal attack at least as bad as suggesting someone hadn't thought before posting?
And my crusade, if you care to term it that, isn't against the world. Just half a dozen would-be PM despots.
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.