in reply to
Re^30: What is "aggressive" argument?
in thread What is "aggressive" argument?
With emphasis added by me:
I refute that your judgements on these issues have any basis in definable, measurable fact. And even if they did, I refute your right to make them.
I never said you couldn't hold an opinion.
Lets see if you can follow the logic here: You refute my my right to make a judgment. But a judgment is an opinion. Ergo, you refute my right to form an opinion!! Simple as that!
So far no one has really come to your defense, and that's because it is well known that you do resort to flamewar style tactics. Now, you can refuse to believe that or consider that perfectly acceptable behavior and then decry how you are unjustly singled out by "half a dozen would-be PM despots." Or you could do a reality check and actually seriously consider whether these so-called would-be despots might actually have a point. But it's clear that will never happen. And because you refuse to consider that possibility, you are a troll who doesn't even realize that he is one! It's sad really. And that's why you are on the proverbial one man crusade vs. the world.
Elda Taluta; Sarks Sark; Ark Arks