Re^4: Site facelift?


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

Re^4: Site facelift?

by wazoox (Prior)

on Nov 18, 2010 at 15:34 UTC ( #872272=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: Site facelift?
in thread Site facelift?

www.perldoc.org uses some old perldoc.perl.org version. Anyway, even the current 2008/2009 look of perldoc.org is better than the 1996 default theme of perlmonks. I don't blame anyone; I'm happy with perlmonks as is, but I want my favorite website to attract new fans, and right now it's nigh to impossible.

Comment on Re^4: Site facelift?
Re^5: Site facelift? by Anonymous Monk on Nov 18, 2010 at 15:37 UTC
but I want my favorite website to attract new fans, and right now it's nigh to impossible. Is it really? Are looks really the cause? How do you know?	[reply]
Re^6: Site facelift? by wazoox (Prior) on Nov 18, 2010 at 15:46 UTC
People can't stand slow sites. People don't like ugly sites. This is true for everyone, programmers aren't a special race of mutants. I'd like to see site statistics to prove me wrong...	[reply]
Re^7: Site facelift? by Anonymous Monk on Nov 19, 2010 at 00:46 UTC
And I'd like to see your underpants	[reply]
Re^7: Site facelift? by Anonymous Monk on Nov 19, 2010 at 00:49 UTC
Your grossly overestimate. Millions upon millions of people used the internet when all they could get was 14.4 kbit/s I'd like to see your statistics	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://872272]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others romping around the Monastery: (6)

As of 2013-05-20 08:00 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

The best material for plates (tableware) is:

Results (408 votes), past polls