Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Site facelift?

by wazoox (Prior)
on Nov 18, 2010 at 21:14 UTC ( #872354=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Site facelift?
in thread Site facelift?

Howdy, come on. These examples are for media companies and advertising websites, nobody thinks perlmonks should look like that. Someone competent and talented propose to work for the website, and you just diss him? How about getting constructive?


Comment on Re^3: Site facelift?
Re^4: Site facelift?
by luis.roca (Deacon) on Nov 19, 2010 at 19:49 UTC

         These examples are for media companies and advertising websites, nobody thinks perlmonks should look like that.

    Least of all me. I've spent years designing for entertainment industry clients. Projects like PerlMonks.org is just the kind of refreshing change I've been looking for. I posted my portfolio simply as proof that I am who I say I am. NOT as a suggestion that PerlMonks should be designed using Nickelodeon orange with a giant space robot intro animation.

    Now, a flying monk Flash intro hmmmmmmm maybe. ;)

    "...the adversities born of well-placed thoughts should be considered mercies rather than misfortunes." Don Quixote
      Please!

      NO Flash

      Bandwidth hogging; exploitable.

             

        NO Flash

        You're preaching to the choir. (at least with me.) I've never liked Flash. Even when it cost me freelance work, I just fought harder for the HTML/CSS jobs. I would n e v e r do this site, it's member and myself such a disservice.

        "...the adversities born of well-placed thoughts should be considered mercies rather than misfortunes." Don Quixote

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://872354]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-08-01 08:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (257 votes), past polls