|Perl Monk, Perl Meditation|
Re^2: What is "aggressive" argument?by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Nov 23, 2010 at 01:18 UTC||Need Help??|
Your problem isn't new.
Hm. (Inevitably:) You're wrong. Or, you might be right, but not in the way you think.
You see, I know why people find me a disagreeable man. There are flavours of course, but mostly, it's because I am.
My only "problem" here is why other people think I should change. More importantly, why do they think that I should want to change.
This place isn't a part of my social life. Just a place where I pass time by attempting to solve interesting problems. As I said somewhere else in this thread, I find programming problems infinitely more interesting and challenging than crosswords or sudoku. Every now and again something I post seems to help the OP and that's nice. And when it doesn't, that okay too, because I probably had fun doing it anyway.
I wish it were possible to have in-depth, technical discussions here, without people taking disagreement with their ideas, code or logic, as attacks on their person; or them resorting to attacks on my person when their technical arguments are exhausted or disproved. It used to be possible.
Just as a person does not have to be beautiful, to do something beautiful; they do not have to be stupid, to do or say something stupid. To say: "That is stupid" is not to say: "You are stupid"; but that distinction seems lost here these days.
I remember when I first came here, I was admonished: "Stop being so damn polite!". Well, this place has knocked it out of me. So, if those with whom I have disagreements, see me as "disagreeable" all I can do is own that.
Nice poem by the way.
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.